Here's the transcript of the June 24, 2000 show:
I apologize, we missed the introduction, and the first few seconds of Bill's reply. We will try to see if we can get it later. Enjoy for now.
 
McPhee sometimes has trouble with words. For instance, instead of Gerson, she says something that sounds like Gershwin, the composer. There are a few places, where we just didn't know what was said, and you will see a few ...... there.
 
Bill O'Neill:.... patient treatment center, and we deliver a different kind 
of cancer treatment.  We deliver what we call patient based, evidence based 
treatment and what this means to us is that we will diagnosis the very 
unique clinical qualities of each cancer patient and we will develop 
therapeutic protocols based on the very unique clinical presentation of each 
patient.
 
CMP: So you can basically, people come to you with information and they, 
they... you then do what with it?
 
Bill: Well what we do is that we practice a cancer diagnostic and cancer 
treatment that is very different from conventional medicine.  Conventional 
medicine operates under the assumption that cancer is a proliferative 
disease. And in fact, it's not, because we know over the past 70 years or so 
we've been treating the disease as though it were a proliferative disease 
and that is that these cells are wildly growing out of control. And over the 
past 70 years in spite of our advancements or changes in approach we really 
haven't effected the life time survival rate.  It still hovers about seven 
to nine percent.
 
But if we look at principals of clinical cancer and immunology and 
orthomolecular medicine we begin to understand that the disease is not a 
proliferative disease but rather an immune system disorder. And what we do 
in our laboratory is we look at each patient to understand what their unique 
clinical immunological disorder and once we understand what their immune 
disorder is, then we can develop treatment to address the very specific 
clinical needs of each unique patient. And what we found over the past 
number of years is that the clinical outcome or the response rates or 
survival rates have been improved dramatically.
 
CMP: So how do you mean you develop treatments. So what goes on? Are you a 
facilitator to this?  Are you a clinic?
 
Bill: We are a laboratory and a clinic.  What we do in our laboratory is we 
take tissue, blood and urine from these patients and we break it down and we 
look at it at a molecular level. And our goal is to understand the very 
unique biochemical and metabolic presentation of each patient and once we 
understand this, once we understand what their chemical and metabolic 
profile is, we will compare it to an optimal profile. And through that 
comparison we are able to discern exactly what is right and what is wrong 
with the patient and why they have a cancer.
 
Once we know that information then what we do in our laboratory, we will 
build a therapeutic protocol  that is designed to shift very specifically 
the patient's biochemistry and metabolism back to the point where we know 
that the patient will have the immunological competency to be parasitic on 
these damaged or malignant cells.
 
CMP: Wow!  So when you're putting together all your assessments, where do 
people go from there? So your assessment is done, then what?
 
Bill: Then we develop the protocol.  The protocol can be something as simple 
as what we call an orthomolecular formula, and these formulas are designed 
to address a very unique biochemical and metabolic needs of each patient.  
Essentially what we build in our laboratory is all of the ingredients 
required to shift their biochemistry from where it is to where it needs to 
be and that can be delivered in the form of an oral medication or an IV.
 
Now some patients we find need more than that and we test to find out what 
specifically they may need and we are able to deliver to patients very 
specific forms of what are called immunotherapies or autologous 
vaccinations.
 
Immunotherapy involves understanding first of all what's broken in the 
patient's immune system and then fixing it.  Fixing that that's broken by 
dosing very specific proteins or cytokines to amplify or augment their 
immune system.
 
Vaccines are a little different.  Vaccines involve taking some of the 
patient's cell line and we culture this in our laboratory and we pull off 
their actual cancer cells ñ their own unique cancer, what's called an 
antigen. It's somewhat like an antibody and we re-inject this antigen back 
into them while we simultaneously inject some proteins as well and we've 
been doing this for a variety of different cancers for the past five years 
or so. And our response as an example for very advanced cancers is two and a 
half times the national average through surgery, radiotherapy and 
chemotherapy.
 
CMP: Well that's good news.
 
Bill: Yeah, it is.  It's very good news to us.  The other very fascinating 
thing that we're learning through all of this is that cancer treatment does 
not have to be toxic.
Our approaches are all natural and we use natural drugs. We also use 
prescription drugs, but we have in our laboratory the ability to titrate 
drugs, and what this means is we're able to dose and cycle drugs so that 
they don't cause adverse reactions or side effects.  So, that's another very 
fascinating aspect of this type of cancer treatment because we've been kind 
of socialized to expect that when   someone has cancer they're bald or 
they're very sick or they're vomiting all the time and that simply doesn't 
have to be the case anymore.
 
CMP: Now, is something like this affordable?
 
Bill: Well, it's uhm, that's a really good question.  One of the very big 
problems in our socialized health care system which is ..........is 
not only the state that it is in, but the fact that it's such a huge burden 
on the system and that it takes an enormous amount of effort and time to 
make changes.
 
  We're essentially outside the system and we're able to take what are 
considered the leading edge approaches in cancer diagnostic and treatment 
and to deliver it to the healthcare consumer immediately.  What that means 
to them is that it essentially isn't covered by Provincial formularies such 
as OHIP in this Province and what it does mean is that they do have to pay 
for it out of pocket.  Now about 50 per cent of the patients that we work 
with have private health care.  The private health care insurer will cover 
the treatments and the treatment cost to a patient can be anywhere from 
about $10,000 to $20,000 over a period of about 12 months.
 
CMP: Wow!  We've got joining me in the studio, is Dr. Mohamed Khaled.  
Mohamed, have you got a question at all for Bill O'Neill?
 
MK: Hi Mr. O'Neill.
 
Bill: Hi Dr. Khaled.
 
MK: Gee, it sounds pretty technical. I wonder, for our listening audience, 
can you give us an idea of what exactly you're describing other than 
immunotherapy?  We understand about cancer and the variety of different 
causes it has, but please tell us what kind of cancer this might work better 
for than others and what kind of experiences the patient will have there. 
Because it sounds like what you're doing as I understand it is immunotherapy 
directed at specific cancers which may work for some but not other cancers.
 
Bill: Well, that's a good question.  What we're learning through sort of 
like a conventional delivery system right now is that the way that we 
approach the disease is essentially not working. And if we look at some 
detail in that approach we find everything from the treatment itself through 
to the way that we stage or class it simply is not working.  For example, we 
may have someone with a particular type of cancer, say breast cancer, and 
they have a very advanced stage of the cancer and they do quite well through 
a variety of different treatments, but the overall survival rate may be 
three or four percent for that particular cancer.  So, the question that 
begs to be asked is are we staging this disease properly and are we calling 
it the right thing?
 
MK: So how do you do that differently?
 
Bill: Well, how we do it differently is we don't necessarily focus in on the 
tumour. We focus in on why does the patient have the cancer and our research 
has demonstrated, as have a variety of other proponents internationally, 
demonstrated that there are essentially two types of cancer.  There are what 
are called immunogenic cancers and anogenic cancers.
 
Immunogenic simply means that the patient's body recognized the damaged 
cells but it didn't have the requisite ability to underwrite some form 
of immunological response in managing it.  Now, an anogenic cancer is a 
cancer where the patient has the requisite ability to immunologically manage 
the cancer but didn't have the necessary ability to recognize or distinguish 
the cancer cells from the normal cells and our assays in our lab, we've 
developed a whole variety of assays that allow us to distinguish between 
these two types of cancers.
 
MK: So you not focusing so much on colon versus breast, or lymphoma, you're 
working at the chemical marker that's within the cancer and how the cancer 
seems to relate to the body?
 
Bill: That's essentially it.  We know that we all have malignant cells in us 
all the time and we know that all species with few exceptions are born with 
the requisite DNA-scripted biochemistry and metabolic competency to be 
parasitic upon these damaged cells. And when a host organism, when a patient 
loses their biochemistry or their metabolic competency there's a chance that 
these cells could grow into clusters or tumours.
 
So what we do in our lab, first of all when we diagnose a patient, we will 
do what we call the orthomolecular profile.  We'll look at their 
biochemistry and we'll look at their metabolism at a molecular level. And 
once we have the patient's blueprint in front of us, we'll reference their 
blueprint to an optimal human blueprint that has the requisite biochemical 
and metabolic competency to be parasitic.
 
MK: So, let me ask you a question about that if you don't mind.  I've seen 
similar approaches before where people have, you know, pages full of 
multiple chemicals and so on, and say I'm here I should be here.  What if 
you've got the optimal chemical profile, how do you know what the right 
amount of sodium is for a cancer patient? What's the right amount of 
magnesium or zinc or cadmium, and how do you know that's scientific and how 
do you know that relates to the lady or the person you see in front of you?
 
Bill: Well, I know this from two perspectives.  First of all, one is the 
prerequisite to our data was massing a variety of international data on 
human biochemistry and human metabolism and we developed a very extensive 
database on this information and these measures. And what we now know, 
retrospectively, on the basis of reviewing hundreds and hundreds of patients 
we've treated since 1993, is that in fact, this approach is working.
So, you know, we're not suggesting necessarily that this is the cure for 
cancer because our goal is not to cure cancer. Our goal is to find out what 
anomalies might exist within a patient that,that might represent some 
keyholes from which we can build keys in our laboratory.
 
So, if, uh, you know, we've got a handful of people.  For example, we do 
very well with prostate cancer and simply by, by taking that patient's blood 
and tumour, and urine to our laboratory and doing the runs on molecular 
profile, and we have such a large number of prostate cancer patients who are 
in what conventional physicians would characterize as a remission, we 
characterize as having the biochemical and metabolic competency to be 
parasite on the damaged or malignant cells.
 
So, it's, it's a tough question to answer in the sense that there, you know, 
we,we expect that there is some empirical or mutable data out there. That's 
not necessarily the case. We're constantly evolving our understanding and, 
and our data and uh, like anything else in today's world it's a very dynamic 
and fast paced process.  We're constantly updating our databases and 
gleaning a clearer, a clearer understanding of all these measures.
 
CMP: With cancer striking thousands of North Americans each year, you know 
it's frightening and I want to be able to talk with Bill McNeill and Dr. 
Mohamed Khaled on diet and some of the other solutions on why we've reached 
the epidemic proportions that we have.  I'm Christine McPhee with The Touch 
of Health, don't go away.
 
CMP: With prevention, staying healthy is primary but you know what? For 
those that are patient responsible and taking control, you know, cancer may 
be not quite the ________ as it is and it won't be as frustrating and it 
won't be as confusing and maybe most of us won't feel as guilty.
Bill, I want to get talking with you as well as Mohamed with my last 
question. Diet being an important part, uh, what would be.... there's so 
many theories out there, the raw food juicing, there's the Gershwin, there's 
the Brouse(?)uh, to be able to eliminate any eating whatever for 40 days. 
What do you recommend?
 
Bill: Well uh food is obviously important and uh,understanding one's 
nutritional status and acting on it is critical.  I think that there's uh a 
predisposition, unfortunately, to a variety of different fads, particularly 
associated with the field that we specialize in, cancer.  There's a lot of 
foods out there that get a uh very significant bad rap, not because of the 
food themselves but because of the way they're processed.
 
  Our food chain is essentially extremely polluted.  Extremely polluted now 
are genetically modified food that in many cases is entirely inconsistent to 
life and is, uh has not been tested and it's effects are unknown.
I think that uh the other factor to consider is in the past 100 years, the 
amount of exposure that has been compressed, and by exposure I mean toxic 
insults and chemistry, organic and otherwise,uh has been compressed and uh 
we've been confronted with an enormous uh adaptation challenge.
 
The human body is amazing. It can adapt, but the degree and extent of 
exposure over the past 100 years has been such that our bodies have simply 
not been able to adapt.  For example, we know that higher levels of 
antioxidants would be beneficial to all of us and uh we we simply don't have 
high enough blood and tissues levels of these. We know that various 
different types of blood chemistry have very different needs, biochemical 
needs, and so you know for example, uh uh.
 
CMP: Okay so blood typing is pretty much how you focus in to be able to give 
a diet recommendation.  Mohamed, how do you feel, like the variety that's 
out there.  If somebody on cancer....raw food, eating protein, no meat. What 
kind of solution? Where do you go?
 
MK: Well Christine, it would be nice if I could say here's a solution to 
cancer. Here's our diet. But what we do at our clinic and I think it's, 
there again, very individualized, is tell people to eat well. Eat healthy 
food, fresh fruit and vegetables. Stay away from all the processed food that 
comes out of a can, out of a box, out of a paper bag that you buy from a 
restaurant and try to eat healthy whole foods. And that's really a very good 
way to lead your life and help prevent cancers from occurring and help fight 
the cancers that you have.
 
I think supplemental nutrition is very important because there is not a 
situation where you just want to stay well.  You have to have as much 
energy, as many nutrients, as many antioxidants as you can to fight the 
battle.  So we like to supplement our cancer patients and we like to use a 
lot of good healthy, whole food. That's what I say.
 
CMP: Bill, let's talk about quickly exercise. Do you encourage that?  Is 
there types of exercise? Intake of oxygen is so vital. Cancer does not live 
in an oxidatative environment, you know. Do you recommend a lot of that?  Do 
you, you know, ummh?
 
Bill: Yeah.  These are factors.  We will. When you do an overall assessment 
of the patient upon intake,  we we will look at all of these factors, 
lifestyle, stress, exercise, nutrition, spiritual and emotional status.  We, 
we'lllook at the entire ecosystem and we'll work with the patient in 
developing and designing a protocol that doesn't include just the medical 
part.
 
But well you know, we look at things like stress in one's lifestyle too, and 
you know the amount of exercise one's getting to relieve that stress and 
we'll develop a therapeutic protocol that will address uh all of these 
factors, you know whether it's financial or physical or emotional or 
spiritual or medical.
 
And so you know there's so many components. And you know, we know that 
moderation is the key but we also know that in today's very complex society, 
sometimes moderation is difficult and so we'll look to,uh you know, 
facilitating some moderate to aggressive approach with each patient.
 
CMP: So, everyone being an individual, and Mohamed how do you feel about 
that?
 
MK: You know it's very interesting what he has to say because I think that's 
a very good approach.  At our clinic we have a variety of different 
practitioner's who look at the patient.  We look at the patient from their 
mental health, to their spiritual health.  We look at the patient's uh 
physical and exercise needs.  We look at the patient's nutritional needs.
 
CMP: How do you do that?  Do you do that by an assessment? What?
 
MK: I'll tell you what we do.  When people come in for an assessment they 
see myself. They see another lady that I work with named Gabriele Sutton, 
whose an integrative medicine consultant. They'll see another doctor that we 
work with who's a traditional Chinese medicine doctor.  We put together a 
program for the patient which may involve diet, nutrition,um, homeopathy.  
Then we give them to the other practitioners that work within our clinic and 
we work on the patient as a team.
 
  So it is really a team-based clinic and we have homeopaths. We have 
aromatherapists. We have stress management, people to help you with 
medication, with exercise, as well as myself as the medical doctor and the 
other practitioners working together to provide for the patient.
 
CMP: Hearing all this and someone getting involved,um, you know the 
alternative medicine way could be a full time job, a full time job, cause 
you've got to see this person and then that person.
 
MK: Well you know, I think the goal is to let patients become independent. 
Let patients live their life well and to stay away from what you're 
referring to really which is sort of the uh  victimization of the patient, 
so the patient really has to spend all of their life dealing with their 
illnesses.  We don't want that. We want patients to get out there and live 
their life. Feel independent. Be happy. Do as much as they can outside of 
our clinic. But patients sometimes need support when they have cancer.  They 
have to deal with their cancer and that's what we're there for. But really 
the whole idea is let patient's live their life and not spend their time 
being patients or being sick.
 
Bill:  Well, if I might intervene, I have to agree entirely with you 
Mohamed.  I think that uh uh often times we need the contrast of black to 
see white, and uh I'm referring specifically to our approaches, not 
necessarily clinically but sociologically in our regional cancer centers 
across Canada. And uh I, I get many patients who have, in the cancer center, 
who have failed the treatment, patients who are in a very advanced state and 
they come through the door here.
 
One of the very first things that we know which is fundamentally critical is 
that they are hopeless and desperate and they've been significantly severely 
injured on a physiological as well as a psychological level.
 
CMP: You know what? We have to be able to go. And where can someone reach 
you Bill?
 
Bill: In Ottawa, it's 613-239-0220.
 
CMP: Thank you very much. And Mohamed in your clinic in Waterdown, where 
can they reach you?
 
MK: They can call my office. It's 905-333-4936, and we'll set them up for an 
assessment.
 
CMP:Thank you very much for everyone from the same attitude, hope and 
motivation and don't go away we'll be right back.
 
 
Handy Links 
 How to file broadcast complaints
 
 
 
 E-mail the CBSC
 
 
 
 
 Society of Professional Journalist code of ethics
 
 
 Code of Ethics - Radio Television News Directors Association of Canada
Here are some highlights of that code:
 
 
 - The main purpose of broadcast journalism is to inform the public in
an accurate, comprehensive and balanced manner about events of
importance.
  - News and public affairs broadcasts will put events into perspective
by presenting relevant background information.
  - Broadcast journalists will not sensationalize news items and will
resist pressures, whether from inside or outside the
broadcasting industry, to do so. They will in no way distort the
news.
  - Broadcast journalists will govern themselves on and off the job in
such a way as to avoid conflict of interest, real or apparent.   
    
 Government  
     Associations  
  | 
 
 |