QuackeryWatch.com

Documenting health fraud and misinformation in Canada

The money: what Children's Health Defense's own tax returns show

A federal racketeering suit against the American Academy of Pediatrics presents two physicians as men destroyed for dissenting. The organisation standing behind them files an annual return with the Internal Revenue Service, and those returns are public. Over three years it spent $10.09 million on legal fees — and books most of that as its charitable programme rather than as overhead.

A QuackeryWatch record · Posted 21 October 2026 · build 21-10-F · Companion to the RICO suit record and the RFK Jr. running file

What this page is, and what it is not

Every figure here comes from Children's Health Defense's own Form 990 returns, filed under penalty of perjury with the Internal Revenue Service and made public by federal law. The returns for 2022, 2023 and 2024 have been read page by page, including the schedules. Where a number is not in the filings, this page says so rather than supplying one.

Nothing here alleges wrongdoing. Raising money, paying salaries, retaining lawyers, disclosing a related-party transaction and running a deficit are ordinary things that charities do, and doing them is not misconduct. A large budget is not evidence of bad faith any more than a small one is evidence of virtue. What the filings establish is scale, and where the money goes — both of which are relevant when an organisation is presented to a federal court, and to the public, as the underdog.

This is a running file. CHD's return for a given year posts roughly nine to fifteen months after that year ends. The 2025 return is due, with extension, on 16 November 2026; on past form it may already have been filed, and would become public some months later. This page will be updated when it appears.

Where to check every number on this page

Children's Health Defense is a 501(c)(3) public charity, EIN 26-0388604, registered at 852 Franklin Avenue, Suite 511, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey. Its tax exemption was issued in October 2007.

Returns for every year from 2015 to 2024 are free to read. ProPublica's Nonprofit Explorer republishes the filings and links the original PDF for each year; the IRS's own Tax Exempt Organization Search holds the same documents. Both are listed under Sources at the foot of this page. Any reader who thinks a figure here is wrong can check it against the filing in a few minutes, and is invited to.

One oddity worth noting at the outset

The IRS classifies Children's Health Defense under NTEE code C20 — Environmental Quality, Protection and Beautification / Pollution Abatement and Control Services.

Not children's health. Not medical research. Not patient advocacy. Pollution control. That classification is carried on the organisation's exemption and is what appears in the public record today, nineteen years on.

Ten years of revenue

“Net income” below is revenue less expenses as reported; “net assets” is the figure at the close of each year.

Year Revenue Expenses Net income Net assets
2015$467,443$47,812+$419,631$390,741
2016$165,937$407,202−$241,265$149,477
2017$727,175$666,610+$60,565$210,042
2018$1,082,293$746,453+$335,840$545,882
2019$2,941,894$1,860,487+$1,081,407$1,627,289
2020$6,834,424$4,743,498+$2,090,926$3,718,215
2021$15,990,132$9,122,211+$6,867,921$10,586,136
2022$23,541,029$14,469,197+$9,071,832$19,657,968
2023$16,146,234$19,212,861−$3,066,627$16,591,341
2024$15,234,096$15,917,481−$683,385$15,819,676

In 2016 the organisation took in $165,937 and finished the year with $149,477 to its name. Six years later it took in $23.5 million and held nearly $20 million. Measured against 2016 that is a rise of a hundred and forty fold — but 2016 flatters the comparison, being the weakest year on the record and the only one before 2023 in which the organisation spent more than it took in. Measured from 2017 the increase is thirty-twofold, which is the fairer figure and remarkable enough. Either way the steepest part of the climb — 2020 to 2022 — coincides exactly with the pandemic.

The organisation is past its peak and drawing down reserves

Revenue peaked in 2022 at $23,541,029. In 2023 it fell to $16.1 million and in 2024 to $15.2 million — a decline of 35.3 per cent from the peak.

Spending did not fall with it. In 2023 the organisation spent $19.2 million against $16.1 million of revenue, a deficit of $3,066,627. In 2024 it spent $15.9 million against $15.2 million, a further deficit of $683,385. Net assets fell from $19.7 million at the end of 2022 to $15.8 million at the end of 2024, and cash and short-term savings fell within 2024 alone from $13,369,252 to $7,841,435.

Two consecutive years of drawing down reserves. That is the financial position of the organisation that, in January 2026, filed a federal racketeering action seeking treble damages against the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Why the spending rose

Expenses jumped $4,743,664 between 2022 and 2023, then fell back $3,295,380 in 2024 while still sitting $1,448,284 above where they started. The returns say exactly what drove it. The six groupings below are our own consolidation of the individual lines of Part IX, and each year's groupings add back to that year's reported total to the dollar.

Children's Health Defense expenditure by category, 2022 to 2024 Grouped horizontal bars. Staff and officer costs rise from $5.58 million in 2022 to $9.75 million in 2023 and stay at $9.66 million in 2024, while legal fees peak at $4.36 million in 2023 and fall to $2.64 million in 2024. All figures from Part IX of the filed Form 990 returns. TAX YEAR 2022 2023 2024 0 $2M $4M $6M $8M $10M Staff and officers $5,579,358 $9,754,834 $9,662,853 Legal fees $3,086,158 $4,362,739 $2,637,179 Other professional fees $2,812,397 $1,329,354 $1,572,028 Media and publishing $877,187 $1,021,130 $150,817 Events and travel $299,025 $718,897 $336,917 Grants and operations $1,815,072 $2,025,907 $1,557,687
Figure 1. Expenditure by category, 2022–2024, from Part IX of the filed returns. Staff and officers covers salaries, officer compensation, benefits, pension and payroll taxes. Grants and operations covers all grants plus information technology, office, insurance, merchant fees, payments to affiliates, interest, depreciation, dues and other expenses.

Payroll was 88 per cent of the 2023 increase. Salaries other than officers nearly doubled in a single year, from $3,193,920 to $6,241,363. Add benefits, payroll taxes and officer compensation and total people costs rose $4,175,476 — against a total increase of $4,743,664.

What changed, 2022 → 2023Change
Salaries other than officers+$3,047,443
Employee benefits+$664,040
Payroll taxes+$287,372
Officer compensation+$176,621
All people costs+$4,175,476
Legal fees+$1,276,581
Grants (none the year before)+$592,599
Conferences and meetings+$419,872
Other fees for services−$1,542,245
Information technology−$245,617
Payments to affiliates−$215,190
Net of every line+$4,743,664

Note the one large offset. Contracted “other fees for services” fell $1,542,245 in the same year that salaries rose by three million. That pairing is what it looks like when an organisation stops buying work from outside and puts those people on staff instead. 2023 is also the year it launched Reform Pharma, described further down in its own words.

Then 2024 came down — but payroll did not. Total people cost was $9,754,834 in 2023 and $9,662,853 in 2024: essentially flat. What fell was legal fees, by $1,725,560; conferences, by $668,406; video and photography, by $584,657; grants, back to nothing; and publications and office costs.

Share of total expenditure by category, 2022, 2023 and 2024 Three donut charts. Staff and officer costs grow from 38.6 per cent of all spending in 2022 to 50.8 per cent in 2023 and 60.7 per cent in 2024. Legal fees are 21.3, 22.7 and 16.6 per cent. All figures from Part IX of the filed Form 990 returns. 39% 21% 19% 6% 13% 2022 $14.5M 51% 23% 7% 5% 11% 2023 $19.2M 61% 17% 10% 10% 2024 $15.9M Staff and officers Legal fees Other professional fees Media and publishing Events and travel Grants and operations
Figure 2. The same six categories as a share of each year's total expenditure. Segments run in the same order in all three years, clockwise from the top. Percentages are shown for any segment at or above five per cent; the full figures are in Figure 1 and in the tables on this page.

That is the whole answer, and the donuts carry it: people costs were 38.6 per cent of all spending in 2022, 50.8 per cent in 2023 and 60.7 per cent in 2024.

A fundraising surge converted into permanent headcount

In 2022 the organisation raised $23.5 million, spent $14.5 million and banked $9 million. It spent the following year hiring. Revenue has since fallen 35 per cent from that peak and payroll has not followed it down — six dollars in every ten now go to staff.

That is why the deficits are structural rather than one-off. A legal bill can be cut in a single year, and in 2024 it was, by 40 per cent. A staff cannot be cut that fast. On a different line of the same returns, the number of individuals paid more than $100,000 runs 8 in 2022, 10 in 2023 and 21 in 2024 — though that last figure sits oddly against flat payroll, so it is reported as filed and no argument is built on it.

One caution about comparing years

A few expense lines move between categories from year to year. Travel is blank on the 2022 and 2023 returns but $286,426 in 2024; video and photography and consulting are itemised in the first two years but not the third, while “all other expenses” rises to $643,830 in 2024. Some of the apparent movement in the smaller categories is therefore reclassification rather than real change. The large movements — payroll and legal fees — are stated on the same numbered lines in all three years and are not affected.

Where the money actually went

Part IX of the return divides every dollar of expenditure three ways: programme services, management and general, and fundraising. The shift across three years is substantial.

Year Total expenses Programme Management Fundraising
2022$14,469,197$13,478,076
93.1%
$850,488
5.9%
$140,633
1.0%
2023$19,212,861$14,549,028
75.7%
$3,662,678
19.1%
$1,001,155
5.2%
2024$15,917,481$11,270,186
70.8%
$3,402,556
21.4%
$1,244,739
7.8%

The reported programme share fell from 93.1 per cent to 70.8 per cent in two years, while management and general quadrupled in dollar terms and fundraising rose from $140,633 to $1,244,739. A 93 per cent programme ratio is unusually high for an organisation of this size, and the later figures are closer to what a charity of this budget would ordinarily report. How an organisation allocates expenditure between these three columns is a matter of its own judgement, and the next section is where that judgement does the most work.

The legal bill

Form 990 requires legal fees to be stated separately, at Part IX line 11b. For an organisation whose public identity is substantially built on litigation, this is the single most informative number in the return.

Year Legal fees Share of all spending Booked as programme Booked as management
2022$3,086,15821.3%$2,981,649$104,509
2023$4,362,73922.7%$3,836,642$526,097
2024$2,637,17916.6%$2,614,617$22,562
Total$10,086,07620.3%$9,432,908$653,168

Ten million and eighty-six thousand dollars on legal fees in three years, a fifth of everything the organisation spent. And of that, $9.43 million — 93.5 per cent of it — is reported as programme service expense rather than as management or overhead.

That is an accounting choice, and it is a defensible one: if litigation is the charitable mission, then its cost is a programme cost. But it is worth seeing plainly, because it means that when a reader is told that seventy or ninety per cent of this charity's money goes to its programmes, a very large part of what is being counted is lawyers.

Who the lawyers are

Part VII, Section B of the return lists the five highest-paid independent contractors receiving more than $100,000. In all three years, four or five of the five are law firms.

YearContractor, as named in the returnServicePaid
2022Jed Rubenfeld — 1031 Forest Road, New Haven, CTLegal$504,668
2022The Gibson Law Firm PLLC — Ithaca, NYLegal$500,145
2022JW Howard Attorneys Ltd — San Diego, CALegal$309,735
2022McCollough Law Firm PC — Dripping Springs, TXLegal$296,497
2022Glassman Wyatt Tuttle Cox PC — Memphis, TNLegal$235,518
2023McCollough Law Firm PC — Dripping Springs, TXLegal$884,351
2023The Gibson Law Firm PLLC — Ithaca, NYLegal$871,959
2023Jed Rubenfeld — New Haven, CTLegal$537,290
2023Schley Look Guthrie Locker LLP — Santa Barbara, CALegal$375,812
2023Roger Teich — 290 Nevada Street, San Francisco, CALegal$293,933
2024McCollough Law Firm PC — Dripping Springs, TXLegal$708,062
2024The Gibson Law Firm PLLC — Ithaca, NYLegal$525,838
2024Tommey Burrowes Productions LLP — Austin, TXFilm/media production$512,682
2024Richard A. Jaffe Esq. — 9 Old Hill Road, Westport, CTLegal$365,601
2024Schley Look Guthrie Locker LLP — Santa Barbara, CALegal$300,416

These are the top five in each year only. The returns state that the number of contractors paid more than $100,000 was 12 in 2022, 14 in 2023 and 10 in 2024.

The lawyer who filed the racketeering suit is on the contractor list

The complaint in Shaw v. American Academy of Pediatrics, filed in the District of Columbia on 21 January 2026, was signed by a single attorney: Richard Jaffe. The docket records every filing in that case as entered by “Jaffe, Richard.”

Children's Health Defense's 2024 return lists Richard A. Jaffe Esq. as an independent contractor paid $365,601 for legal services — in the calendar year ending thirteen months before that complaint was filed.

There is nothing improper in this. Lawyers are paid by their clients; that is the arrangement. CHD is a named plaintiff in the suit, so its counsel being on its books is exactly what one would expect. The point is narrower and factual: Shaw v. AAP is funded litigation brought by an organisation with a multi-million-dollar annual legal budget and a long-standing relationship with the attorney who filed it. It is not two doctors and three parents acting alone, and a reader weighing the case is entitled to know that from the primary record rather than infer it.

Who was paid what

Form 990 requires a charity to name its officers, directors, key employees and highest-compensated employees and state what each was paid. The 2024 return names twenty-five people, of whom twenty-one were paid more than $100,000. Total reportable compensation to those listed was $2,406,635, plus $58,543 in other compensation.

NameTitle, exactly as filed (2024)CompensationOther
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.Chairman on leave (thru 12/9/24)$0$0
Mary S. HollandCEO$238,523$139
Laura BonoExecutive VP (thru 8/5/24)$226,283$87
Kim Mack RosenbergGeneral Counsel$223,615$2,132
Giorgio ZeollaCAO$208,032$13,451
Doug KissellCFO, Treasurer$198,127$8,394
Lynne ArnoldSr Director, IT & Comm (thru 7/19/24)$170,956$2,218
Brian HookerChief Science Officer / Director$158,986$139
Rolf HazlehurstSenior Attorney (thru 11/1/24)$149,798$6,870
Jacqueline HinesED, Education and Programs$146,877$121
Katherine PaulEditor-in-Chief, The Defender$145,655$2,629
Lou WorochController$129,402$4,452
Miriam Eckenfels-GarciaDirector, Fellowships and EMR$129,200$8,996
Kraig MakohusCOO$122,644$5,165
Dawn MayesSecretary (thru 8/16/24)$88,170$972
Janet McLeanSecretary$70,367$2,778

A further nine people are listed as directors or board chairpersons at $0: Kay Sullivan (board chairperson thru 9/1/24), Michelle Walrath (board chairperson), Tony Lyons, Michael Baum, Deirdre Imus, Leigh Merinoff, David Silver, Karen Hopper and Mark Gorton. The board is unpaid, which is the ordinary and proper arrangement.

The chairman's pay, year by year

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is now the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services. What Children's Health Defense paid him while he chaired it is a matter of public record in its own filings:

2018
$184,375 — Chairman and Chief Legal Counsel. Total organisational revenue that year: $1.08 million.
2019
$255,000
2020
$345,561
2021
$497,013, plus $4,503 recorded as other compensation.
2022
$510,515, plus $3,714 other. The peak year for both the man and the organisation.
2023
$326,056, and his title in the filing changes to “Chairman On Leave.” He is still recorded at forty hours a week.
2024
$0. He is listed as “Chairman on leave (thru 12/9/24)” at zero hours per week, and received no compensation from the organisation in that year. 9 December 2024 is the date his service ends on the face of the return.

His compensation rose from $184,375 to $510,515 between 2018 and 2022 — it nearly tripled across the same four years in which the organisation's revenue rose twentyfold. It then fell to $326,056 in 2023 and to nothing in 2024.

The general counsel's second invoice

The 2024 return is flagged for reported conflict of interest transactions. Schedule L is where a charity must disclose business dealings with people connected to it, and in 2024 it contains exactly one entry.

Schedule L, Part IV, as filed

Mack Rosenberg Law LLC — $108,880 — “legal services provided by related law office.”

The stated relationship: “Kim Mack Rosenberg owns greater than 35% and is a key employee of CHD.” The organisation answered “No” to whether the transaction involved sharing its revenues.

Ms. Mack Rosenberg is CHD's General Counsel, paid $223,615 in salary plus $2,132 in other compensation that same year. Her firm's invoice brings the total from CHD to her and her law office to approximately $334,600 in 2024.

This was disclosed, which is the system working. Schedule L exists precisely so that related-party transactions are visible, and CHD reported it as required. Parts I, II and III of the schedule — excess benefit transactions, loans to or from interested persons, and grants benefiting interested persons — are all blank. The organisation's own Schedule O states that conflicts are disclosed at quarterly board meetings, reviewed by the board and where appropriate by outside counsel, and approved only if fair and in accordance with legal standards, and that every director annually signs an acknowledgement of the conflict of interest policy.

The publishing arm and the film arm

Schedule R discloses that Children's Health Defense owns two trading subsidiaries, both registered at its own Franklin Lakes address and both legally domiciled in Georgia:

EntityEINActivityIncome 2023Income 2024
CHD Publishing LLC85-2796239Publishing$221,768$425,510
Children's Health Defense Films LLC85-2807267Films$730,054$539,369

Publishing income nearly doubled between 2023 and 2024 while film income fell by a quarter. The main return's royalty line tracks the publishing arm closely: royalties of $424,510 in 2024 against publishing income of $425,510. Royalties were $971,336 in 2022, $246,714 in 2023 and $424,510 in 2024.

Alongside these, the 2024 return pays Tommey Burrowes Productions LLP $512,682 for film and media production, and the 2023 return records $584,657 in video and photo expenses and $234,084 in publications. This is an organisation that makes and sells media at scale, and the returns record it as such.

What the organisation gave away

Across the three years read for this page, Children's Health Defense made grants in one year only. The 2022 and 2024 returns report no grants to organisations or to individuals at all — those lines are blank.

In 2023 it reported $241,599 to domestic organisations, $36,000 to domestic individuals, and $315,000 to foreign recipients. Schedule I itemises the domestic organisations:

RecipientEINLocationGrant
Neurodiversity Foundation81-4716520Fulshear, TX$136,000
Moms Across America30-0891447Weaverville, NC$25,000
Autism International Association61-1429687Fullerton, CA$20,000
American Citizens for Health Choice45-4477022Eden Prairie, MN$15,000
Autism Age LLC—Trumbull, CT$10,000
Global Health Project92-1612852Los Altos, CA$10,000
The Kirsch Foundation87-3900704Los Altos, CA$10,000

Seven recipients totalling $226,000 of the $241,599 reported; grants below $5,000 need not be itemised. Global Health Project and The Kirsch Foundation are listed at the same street address.

The $36,000 to individuals is recorded by category rather than by name, as the form permits: $24,000 for “educational website support” to one recipient, and $12,000 for “educational podcast support” to one recipient. Neither individual is identified in the return.

For scale: in the single year in which this organisation made grants at all, it gave away $592,599 in total, and spent $4,362,739 on lawyers.

Nothing in these returns shows a payment to Paul Thomas or Kenneth Stoller

The two physicians who head the racketeering complaint appear nowhere in the 2022, 2023 or 2024 returns — not among the officers, directors and key employees; not among the independent contractors paid over $100,000; not in Schedule I; and not in Schedule L. They are plaintiffs in the suit alongside Children's Health Defense, which is a different relationship from being paid by it, and no part of this page should be read as suggesting otherwise.

Two qualifications are owed to the reader. The contractor schedule lists only the five highest-paid in each year, and the returns record 10, 12 and 14 contractors over $100,000 respectively, so payments below the top five are not visible. And in 2023 two unnamed individuals received $24,000 and $12,000. Those are the only gaps, and they are stated rather than filled in.

Where the foreign money went

Schedule F records what a charity does outside the United States. It is reported by region, and the form does not require foreign recipients to be named — in both 2022 and 2023 the recipient column is left entirely blank. The region column is therefore the only reliable test of where the money went, and it is a complete one: every dollar sent abroad has to be attributed to a region.

YearRegionPurpose, as statedAmount
2022Europe, including Iceland and GreenlandPromotional expenses (by wire)$234,933
2022Sub-Saharan AfricaSet up expenses (by wire)$15,054
2023Europe, including Iceland and GreenlandGeneral support (by wire)$245,000
2023Europe, including Iceland and GreenlandGeneral support (by wire)$70,000
2024Europe, including Iceland and Greenland — 3 offices, 3 staff or agentsProgramme services: “science and research / litigation program / education and outreach”$144,202
2024Middle East and North Africa — 1 office, 1 staff member or agentProgramme services: education and outreach$61,664

The 2023 payments are the $315,000 shown on the face of the return as grants to foreign organisations. The 2024 figures are not grants — that return reports no grants of any kind — but expenditure on the organisation's own operations abroad, totalling $205,866 across four offices. Note that by 2024 the European programme is described by the organisation itself as including a litigation program.

No Canadian recipient appears in any of the three years

Canada is absent from the region column in 2022, 2023 and 2024. There is no Canadian grant, no Canadian office, and no Canadian entity among the related organisations disclosed in Schedule R — which lists only CHD Publishing LLC and Children's Health Defense Films LLC, both domiciled in Georgia. No Canadian law firm or lawyer appears among the independent contractors named in any year; every one is American.

One limit on that, stated plainly. Each return names only its five highest-paid contractors. A payment below fifth place would not appear — which means below $235,518 in 2022, below $293,933 in 2023 and below $300,416 in 2024. Within those gaps, the public record is silent. What can be said is that nothing in these filings records money going to Canada, and that the regional reporting, which covers every foreign dollar, shows none.

A programme called Reform Pharma

The 2023 return's Schedule O describes a new programme begun that year, in the organisation's own words:

Schedule O, 2023, Part III line 2

“Reform Pharma was a new program started in 2023. Under this program, the organization aims to end pharmaceutical industry corruption and restore health care integrity by identifying and removing the specific mechanisms the industry uses to embed itself deep within our government, media, and school system.”

The same schedule breaks out the $1,236,270 of “other fees for services” in that year as $980,330 to educational activities contractors and $255,940 for HR services.

What is still not in this page

Three things, each of them a limit on what the public filings contain rather than a gap in the reading:

A note on method

The 2022, 2023 and 2024 returns have been read directly from the filed PDFs, including Parts VII, VIII, IX and X and Schedules I, J, L, O and R. Figures for 2015 to 2021 are as published by ProPublica's Nonprofit Explorer from the IRS's machine-readable release of each return; those years have not been read page by page, and are marked as such here. Percentages are our own arithmetic on the reported figures and can be checked against the table above. Corrections are welcome and will be posted.

Sources. Form 990 returns of Children's Health Defense, EIN 26-0388604, for fiscal years ending December 2015 through December 2024. The returns for 2022 (DLN 93493029019004), 2023 (DLN 93493274013104) and 2024 (DLN 93493274006115) were read in full from the filed documents. All returns are available from ProPublica's Nonprofit Explorer at projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/260388604, which republishes the Internal Revenue Service's release, and from the IRS directly at Tax Exempt Organization Search, searching by EIN under “Copies of Returns.” Filing dates as recorded by ProPublica: FY2024 filed 1 October 2025; FY2023 filed 30 September 2024; FY2022 filed 29 January 2024; FY2021 filed 15 November 2022; FY2020 filed 10 November 2021; FY2019 filed 10 November 2020; FY2018 filed 13 November 2019; FY2015 filed 27 September 2016. Richard Jaffe's role as counsel of record in Shaw v. American Academy of Pediatrics, No. 1:26-cv-00171-TJK (D.D.C.), is from the court's own docket. A separate entity, Children's Health Defense–California Chapter, EIN 85-1140677, files its own returns and is not included in any figure on this page.