The money: what Children's Health Defense's own tax returns show
A federal racketeering suit against the American Academy of Pediatrics presents two physicians as men destroyed for dissenting. The organisation standing behind them files an annual return with the Internal Revenue Service, and those returns are public. Over three years it spent $10.09 million on legal fees — and books most of that as its charitable programme rather than as overhead.
What this page is, and what it is not
Every figure here comes from Children's Health Defense's own Form 990 returns, filed under penalty of perjury with the Internal Revenue Service and made public by federal law. The returns for 2022, 2023 and 2024 have been read page by page, including the schedules. Where a number is not in the filings, this page says so rather than supplying one.
Nothing here alleges wrongdoing. Raising money, paying salaries, retaining lawyers, disclosing a related-party transaction and running a deficit are ordinary things that charities do, and doing them is not misconduct. A large budget is not evidence of bad faith any more than a small one is evidence of virtue. What the filings establish is scale, and where the money goes — both of which are relevant when an organisation is presented to a federal court, and to the public, as the underdog.
This is a running file. CHD's return for a given year posts roughly nine to fifteen months after that year ends. The 2025 return is due, with extension, on 16 November 2026; on past form it may already have been filed, and would become public some months later. This page will be updated when it appears.
Where to check every number on this page
Children's Health Defense is a 501(c)(3) public charity, EIN 26-0388604, registered at 852 Franklin Avenue, Suite 511, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey. Its tax exemption was issued in October 2007.
Returns for every year from 2015 to 2024 are free to read. ProPublica's Nonprofit Explorer republishes the filings and links the original PDF for each year; the IRS's own Tax Exempt Organization Search holds the same documents. Both are listed under Sources at the foot of this page. Any reader who thinks a figure here is wrong can check it against the filing in a few minutes, and is invited to.
One oddity worth noting at the outset
The IRS classifies Children's Health Defense under NTEE code C20 — Environmental Quality, Protection and Beautification / Pollution Abatement and Control Services.
Not children's health. Not medical research. Not patient advocacy. Pollution control. That classification is carried on the organisation's exemption and is what appears in the public record today, nineteen years on.
Ten years of revenue
“Net income” below is revenue less expenses as reported; “net assets” is the figure at the close of each year.
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Net income | Net assets |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | $467,443 | $47,812 | +$419,631 | $390,741 |
| 2016 | $165,937 | $407,202 | −$241,265 | $149,477 |
| 2017 | $727,175 | $666,610 | +$60,565 | $210,042 |
| 2018 | $1,082,293 | $746,453 | +$335,840 | $545,882 |
| 2019 | $2,941,894 | $1,860,487 | +$1,081,407 | $1,627,289 |
| 2020 | $6,834,424 | $4,743,498 | +$2,090,926 | $3,718,215 |
| 2021 | $15,990,132 | $9,122,211 | +$6,867,921 | $10,586,136 |
| 2022 | $23,541,029 | $14,469,197 | +$9,071,832 | $19,657,968 |
| 2023 | $16,146,234 | $19,212,861 | −$3,066,627 | $16,591,341 |
| 2024 | $15,234,096 | $15,917,481 | −$683,385 | $15,819,676 |
In 2016 the organisation took in $165,937 and finished the year with $149,477 to its name. Six years later it took in $23.5 million and held nearly $20 million. Measured against 2016 that is a rise of a hundred and forty fold — but 2016 flatters the comparison, being the weakest year on the record and the only one before 2023 in which the organisation spent more than it took in. Measured from 2017 the increase is thirty-twofold, which is the fairer figure and remarkable enough. Either way the steepest part of the climb — 2020 to 2022 — coincides exactly with the pandemic.
The organisation is past its peak and drawing down reserves
Revenue peaked in 2022 at $23,541,029. In 2023 it fell to $16.1 million and in 2024 to $15.2 million — a decline of 35.3 per cent from the peak.
Spending did not fall with it. In 2023 the organisation spent $19.2 million against $16.1 million of revenue, a deficit of $3,066,627. In 2024 it spent $15.9 million against $15.2 million, a further deficit of $683,385. Net assets fell from $19.7 million at the end of 2022 to $15.8 million at the end of 2024, and cash and short-term savings fell within 2024 alone from $13,369,252 to $7,841,435.
Two consecutive years of drawing down reserves. That is the financial position of the organisation that, in January 2026, filed a federal racketeering action seeking treble damages against the American Academy of Pediatrics.
Why the spending rose
Expenses jumped $4,743,664 between 2022 and 2023, then fell back $3,295,380 in 2024 while still sitting $1,448,284 above where they started. The returns say exactly what drove it. The six groupings below are our own consolidation of the individual lines of Part IX, and each year's groupings add back to that year's reported total to the dollar.
Payroll was 88 per cent of the 2023 increase. Salaries other than officers nearly doubled in a single year, from $3,193,920 to $6,241,363. Add benefits, payroll taxes and officer compensation and total people costs rose $4,175,476 — against a total increase of $4,743,664.
| What changed, 2022 → 2023 | Change |
|---|---|
| Salaries other than officers | +$3,047,443 |
| Employee benefits | +$664,040 |
| Payroll taxes | +$287,372 |
| Officer compensation | +$176,621 |
| All people costs | +$4,175,476 |
| Legal fees | +$1,276,581 |
| Grants (none the year before) | +$592,599 |
| Conferences and meetings | +$419,872 |
| Other fees for services | −$1,542,245 |
| Information technology | −$245,617 |
| Payments to affiliates | −$215,190 |
| Net of every line | +$4,743,664 |
Note the one large offset. Contracted “other fees for services” fell $1,542,245 in the same year that salaries rose by three million. That pairing is what it looks like when an organisation stops buying work from outside and puts those people on staff instead. 2023 is also the year it launched Reform Pharma, described further down in its own words.
Then 2024 came down — but payroll did not. Total people cost was $9,754,834 in 2023 and $9,662,853 in 2024: essentially flat. What fell was legal fees, by $1,725,560; conferences, by $668,406; video and photography, by $584,657; grants, back to nothing; and publications and office costs.
That is the whole answer, and the donuts carry it: people costs were 38.6 per cent of all spending in 2022, 50.8 per cent in 2023 and 60.7 per cent in 2024.
A fundraising surge converted into permanent headcount
In 2022 the organisation raised $23.5 million, spent $14.5 million and banked $9 million. It spent the following year hiring. Revenue has since fallen 35 per cent from that peak and payroll has not followed it down — six dollars in every ten now go to staff.
That is why the deficits are structural rather than one-off. A legal bill can be cut in a single year, and in 2024 it was, by 40 per cent. A staff cannot be cut that fast. On a different line of the same returns, the number of individuals paid more than $100,000 runs 8 in 2022, 10 in 2023 and 21 in 2024 — though that last figure sits oddly against flat payroll, so it is reported as filed and no argument is built on it.
One caution about comparing years
A few expense lines move between categories from year to year. Travel is blank on the 2022 and 2023 returns but $286,426 in 2024; video and photography and consulting are itemised in the first two years but not the third, while “all other expenses” rises to $643,830 in 2024. Some of the apparent movement in the smaller categories is therefore reclassification rather than real change. The large movements — payroll and legal fees — are stated on the same numbered lines in all three years and are not affected.
Where the money actually went
Part IX of the return divides every dollar of expenditure three ways: programme services, management and general, and fundraising. The shift across three years is substantial.
| Year | Total expenses | Programme | Management | Fundraising |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | $14,469,197 | $13,478,076 93.1% | $850,488 5.9% | $140,633 1.0% |
| 2023 | $19,212,861 | $14,549,028 75.7% | $3,662,678 19.1% | $1,001,155 5.2% |
| 2024 | $15,917,481 | $11,270,186 70.8% | $3,402,556 21.4% | $1,244,739 7.8% |
The reported programme share fell from 93.1 per cent to 70.8 per cent in two years, while management and general quadrupled in dollar terms and fundraising rose from $140,633 to $1,244,739. A 93 per cent programme ratio is unusually high for an organisation of this size, and the later figures are closer to what a charity of this budget would ordinarily report. How an organisation allocates expenditure between these three columns is a matter of its own judgement, and the next section is where that judgement does the most work.
The legal bill
Form 990 requires legal fees to be stated separately, at Part IX line 11b. For an organisation whose public identity is substantially built on litigation, this is the single most informative number in the return.
| Year | Legal fees | Share of all spending | Booked as programme | Booked as management |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | $3,086,158 | 21.3% | $2,981,649 | $104,509 |
| 2023 | $4,362,739 | 22.7% | $3,836,642 | $526,097 |
| 2024 | $2,637,179 | 16.6% | $2,614,617 | $22,562 |
| Total | $10,086,076 | 20.3% | $9,432,908 | $653,168 |
Ten million and eighty-six thousand dollars on legal fees in three years, a fifth of everything the organisation spent. And of that, $9.43 million — 93.5 per cent of it — is reported as programme service expense rather than as management or overhead.
That is an accounting choice, and it is a defensible one: if litigation is the charitable mission, then its cost is a programme cost. But it is worth seeing plainly, because it means that when a reader is told that seventy or ninety per cent of this charity's money goes to its programmes, a very large part of what is being counted is lawyers.
Who the lawyers are
Part VII, Section B of the return lists the five highest-paid independent contractors receiving more than $100,000. In all three years, four or five of the five are law firms.
| Year | Contractor, as named in the return | Service | Paid |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Jed Rubenfeld — 1031 Forest Road, New Haven, CT | Legal | $504,668 |
| 2022 | The Gibson Law Firm PLLC — Ithaca, NY | Legal | $500,145 |
| 2022 | JW Howard Attorneys Ltd — San Diego, CA | Legal | $309,735 |
| 2022 | McCollough Law Firm PC — Dripping Springs, TX | Legal | $296,497 |
| 2022 | Glassman Wyatt Tuttle Cox PC — Memphis, TN | Legal | $235,518 |
| 2023 | McCollough Law Firm PC — Dripping Springs, TX | Legal | $884,351 |
| 2023 | The Gibson Law Firm PLLC — Ithaca, NY | Legal | $871,959 |
| 2023 | Jed Rubenfeld — New Haven, CT | Legal | $537,290 |
| 2023 | Schley Look Guthrie Locker LLP — Santa Barbara, CA | Legal | $375,812 |
| 2023 | Roger Teich — 290 Nevada Street, San Francisco, CA | Legal | $293,933 |
| 2024 | McCollough Law Firm PC — Dripping Springs, TX | Legal | $708,062 |
| 2024 | The Gibson Law Firm PLLC — Ithaca, NY | Legal | $525,838 |
| 2024 | Tommey Burrowes Productions LLP — Austin, TX | Film/media production | $512,682 |
| 2024 | Richard A. Jaffe Esq. — 9 Old Hill Road, Westport, CT | Legal | $365,601 |
| 2024 | Schley Look Guthrie Locker LLP — Santa Barbara, CA | Legal | $300,416 |
These are the top five in each year only. The returns state that the number of contractors paid more than $100,000 was 12 in 2022, 14 in 2023 and 10 in 2024.
The lawyer who filed the racketeering suit is on the contractor list
The complaint in Shaw v. American Academy of Pediatrics, filed in the District of Columbia on 21 January 2026, was signed by a single attorney: Richard Jaffe. The docket records every filing in that case as entered by “Jaffe, Richard.”
Children's Health Defense's 2024 return lists Richard A. Jaffe Esq. as an independent contractor paid $365,601 for legal services — in the calendar year ending thirteen months before that complaint was filed.
There is nothing improper in this. Lawyers are paid by their clients; that is the arrangement. CHD is a named plaintiff in the suit, so its counsel being on its books is exactly what one would expect. The point is narrower and factual: Shaw v. AAP is funded litigation brought by an organisation with a multi-million-dollar annual legal budget and a long-standing relationship with the attorney who filed it. It is not two doctors and three parents acting alone, and a reader weighing the case is entitled to know that from the primary record rather than infer it.
Who was paid what
Form 990 requires a charity to name its officers, directors, key employees and highest-compensated employees and state what each was paid. The 2024 return names twenty-five people, of whom twenty-one were paid more than $100,000. Total reportable compensation to those listed was $2,406,635, plus $58,543 in other compensation.
| Name | Title, exactly as filed (2024) | Compensation | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Robert F. Kennedy Jr. | Chairman on leave (thru 12/9/24) | $0 | $0 |
| Mary S. Holland | CEO | $238,523 | $139 |
| Laura Bono | Executive VP (thru 8/5/24) | $226,283 | $87 |
| Kim Mack Rosenberg | General Counsel | $223,615 | $2,132 |
| Giorgio Zeolla | CAO | $208,032 | $13,451 |
| Doug Kissell | CFO, Treasurer | $198,127 | $8,394 |
| Lynne Arnold | Sr Director, IT & Comm (thru 7/19/24) | $170,956 | $2,218 |
| Brian Hooker | Chief Science Officer / Director | $158,986 | $139 |
| Rolf Hazlehurst | Senior Attorney (thru 11/1/24) | $149,798 | $6,870 |
| Jacqueline Hines | ED, Education and Programs | $146,877 | $121 |
| Katherine Paul | Editor-in-Chief, The Defender | $145,655 | $2,629 |
| Lou Woroch | Controller | $129,402 | $4,452 |
| Miriam Eckenfels-Garcia | Director, Fellowships and EMR | $129,200 | $8,996 |
| Kraig Makohus | COO | $122,644 | $5,165 |
| Dawn Mayes | Secretary (thru 8/16/24) | $88,170 | $972 |
| Janet McLean | Secretary | $70,367 | $2,778 |
A further nine people are listed as directors or board chairpersons at $0: Kay Sullivan (board chairperson thru 9/1/24), Michelle Walrath (board chairperson), Tony Lyons, Michael Baum, Deirdre Imus, Leigh Merinoff, David Silver, Karen Hopper and Mark Gorton. The board is unpaid, which is the ordinary and proper arrangement.
The chairman's pay, year by year
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is now the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services. What Children's Health Defense paid him while he chaired it is a matter of public record in its own filings:
His compensation rose from $184,375 to $510,515 between 2018 and 2022 — it nearly tripled across the same four years in which the organisation's revenue rose twentyfold. It then fell to $326,056 in 2023 and to nothing in 2024.
The general counsel's second invoice
The 2024 return is flagged for reported conflict of interest transactions. Schedule L is where a charity must disclose business dealings with people connected to it, and in 2024 it contains exactly one entry.
Schedule L, Part IV, as filed
Mack Rosenberg Law LLC — $108,880 — “legal services provided by related law office.”
The stated relationship: “Kim Mack Rosenberg owns greater than 35% and is a key employee of CHD.” The organisation answered “No” to whether the transaction involved sharing its revenues.
Ms. Mack Rosenberg is CHD's General Counsel, paid $223,615 in salary plus $2,132 in other compensation that same year. Her firm's invoice brings the total from CHD to her and her law office to approximately $334,600 in 2024.
This was disclosed, which is the system working. Schedule L exists precisely so that related-party transactions are visible, and CHD reported it as required. Parts I, II and III of the schedule — excess benefit transactions, loans to or from interested persons, and grants benefiting interested persons — are all blank. The organisation's own Schedule O states that conflicts are disclosed at quarterly board meetings, reviewed by the board and where appropriate by outside counsel, and approved only if fair and in accordance with legal standards, and that every director annually signs an acknowledgement of the conflict of interest policy.
The publishing arm and the film arm
Schedule R discloses that Children's Health Defense owns two trading subsidiaries, both registered at its own Franklin Lakes address and both legally domiciled in Georgia:
| Entity | EIN | Activity | Income 2023 | Income 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHD Publishing LLC | 85-2796239 | Publishing | $221,768 | $425,510 |
| Children's Health Defense Films LLC | 85-2807267 | Films | $730,054 | $539,369 |
Publishing income nearly doubled between 2023 and 2024 while film income fell by a quarter. The main return's royalty line tracks the publishing arm closely: royalties of $424,510 in 2024 against publishing income of $425,510. Royalties were $971,336 in 2022, $246,714 in 2023 and $424,510 in 2024.
Alongside these, the 2024 return pays Tommey Burrowes Productions LLP $512,682 for film and media production, and the 2023 return records $584,657 in video and photo expenses and $234,084 in publications. This is an organisation that makes and sells media at scale, and the returns record it as such.
What the organisation gave away
Across the three years read for this page, Children's Health Defense made grants in one year only. The 2022 and 2024 returns report no grants to organisations or to individuals at all — those lines are blank.
In 2023 it reported $241,599 to domestic organisations, $36,000 to domestic individuals, and $315,000 to foreign recipients. Schedule I itemises the domestic organisations:
| Recipient | EIN | Location | Grant |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neurodiversity Foundation | 81-4716520 | Fulshear, TX | $136,000 |
| Moms Across America | 30-0891447 | Weaverville, NC | $25,000 |
| Autism International Association | 61-1429687 | Fullerton, CA | $20,000 |
| American Citizens for Health Choice | 45-4477022 | Eden Prairie, MN | $15,000 |
| Autism Age LLC | — | Trumbull, CT | $10,000 |
| Global Health Project | 92-1612852 | Los Altos, CA | $10,000 |
| The Kirsch Foundation | 87-3900704 | Los Altos, CA | $10,000 |
Seven recipients totalling $226,000 of the $241,599 reported; grants below $5,000 need not be itemised. Global Health Project and The Kirsch Foundation are listed at the same street address.
The $36,000 to individuals is recorded by category rather than by name, as the form permits: $24,000 for “educational website support” to one recipient, and $12,000 for “educational podcast support” to one recipient. Neither individual is identified in the return.
For scale: in the single year in which this organisation made grants at all, it gave away $592,599 in total, and spent $4,362,739 on lawyers.
Nothing in these returns shows a payment to Paul Thomas or Kenneth Stoller
The two physicians who head the racketeering complaint appear nowhere in the 2022, 2023 or 2024 returns — not among the officers, directors and key employees; not among the independent contractors paid over $100,000; not in Schedule I; and not in Schedule L. They are plaintiffs in the suit alongside Children's Health Defense, which is a different relationship from being paid by it, and no part of this page should be read as suggesting otherwise.
Two qualifications are owed to the reader. The contractor schedule lists only the five highest-paid in each year, and the returns record 10, 12 and 14 contractors over $100,000 respectively, so payments below the top five are not visible. And in 2023 two unnamed individuals received $24,000 and $12,000. Those are the only gaps, and they are stated rather than filled in.
Where the foreign money went
Schedule F records what a charity does outside the United States. It is reported by region, and the form does not require foreign recipients to be named — in both 2022 and 2023 the recipient column is left entirely blank. The region column is therefore the only reliable test of where the money went, and it is a complete one: every dollar sent abroad has to be attributed to a region.
| Year | Region | Purpose, as stated | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Europe, including Iceland and Greenland | Promotional expenses (by wire) | $234,933 |
| 2022 | Sub-Saharan Africa | Set up expenses (by wire) | $15,054 |
| 2023 | Europe, including Iceland and Greenland | General support (by wire) | $245,000 |
| 2023 | Europe, including Iceland and Greenland | General support (by wire) | $70,000 |
| 2024 | Europe, including Iceland and Greenland — 3 offices, 3 staff or agents | Programme services: “science and research / litigation program / education and outreach” | $144,202 |
| 2024 | Middle East and North Africa — 1 office, 1 staff member or agent | Programme services: education and outreach | $61,664 |
The 2023 payments are the $315,000 shown on the face of the return as grants to foreign organisations. The 2024 figures are not grants — that return reports no grants of any kind — but expenditure on the organisation's own operations abroad, totalling $205,866 across four offices. Note that by 2024 the European programme is described by the organisation itself as including a litigation program.
No Canadian recipient appears in any of the three years
Canada is absent from the region column in 2022, 2023 and 2024. There is no Canadian grant, no Canadian office, and no Canadian entity among the related organisations disclosed in Schedule R — which lists only CHD Publishing LLC and Children's Health Defense Films LLC, both domiciled in Georgia. No Canadian law firm or lawyer appears among the independent contractors named in any year; every one is American.
One limit on that, stated plainly. Each return names only its five highest-paid contractors. A payment below fifth place would not appear — which means below $235,518 in 2022, below $293,933 in 2023 and below $300,416 in 2024. Within those gaps, the public record is silent. What can be said is that nothing in these filings records money going to Canada, and that the regional reporting, which covers every foreign dollar, shows none.
A programme called Reform Pharma
The 2023 return's Schedule O describes a new programme begun that year, in the organisation's own words:
Schedule O, 2023, Part III line 2
“Reform Pharma was a new program started in 2023. Under this program, the organization aims to end pharmaceutical industry corruption and restore health care integrity by identifying and removing the specific mechanisms the industry uses to embed itself deep within our government, media, and school system.”
The same schedule breaks out the $1,236,270 of “other fees for services” in that year as $980,330 to educational activities contractors and $255,940 for HR services.
What is still not in this page
Three things, each of them a limit on what the public filings contain rather than a gap in the reading:
- Donors are not public. Schedule B, which lists substantial contributors, is withheld from public inspection by law. The 2024 return records $14,119,684 in contributions, of which $4,620,398 was non-cash — nearly a third. Who gave it, and what the non-cash gifts consisted of, is not in the public document.
- Contractors below the top five. Each year's return names only the five highest-paid, while stating that 12, 14 and 10 contractors respectively exceeded $100,000 in 2022, 2023 and 2024. The unnamed remainder is everything paid less than $235,518 in 2022, $293,933 in 2023 and $300,416 in 2024.
- The 2025 return. Due 16 November 2026 with extension, and likely public some months after filing. It will cover the year Kennedy became Health Secretary and the year in which Shaw v. AAP was prepared, and it will show whether the revenue decline ran to a third year.
A note on method
The 2022, 2023 and 2024 returns have been read directly from the filed PDFs, including Parts VII, VIII, IX and X and Schedules I, J, L, O and R. Figures for 2015 to 2021 are as published by ProPublica's Nonprofit Explorer from the IRS's machine-readable release of each return; those years have not been read page by page, and are marked as such here. Percentages are our own arithmetic on the reported figures and can be checked against the table above. Corrections are welcome and will be posted.
Sources. Form 990 returns of Children's Health Defense, EIN 26-0388604, for fiscal years ending December 2015 through December 2024. The returns for 2022 (DLN 93493029019004), 2023 (DLN 93493274013104) and 2024 (DLN 93493274006115) were read in full from the filed documents. All returns are available from ProPublica's Nonprofit Explorer at projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/260388604, which republishes the Internal Revenue Service's release, and from the IRS directly at Tax Exempt Organization Search, searching by EIN under “Copies of Returns.” Filing dates as recorded by ProPublica: FY2024 filed 1 October 2025; FY2023 filed 30 September 2024; FY2022 filed 29 January 2024; FY2021 filed 15 November 2022; FY2020 filed 10 November 2021; FY2019 filed 10 November 2020; FY2018 filed 13 November 2019; FY2015 filed 27 September 2016. Richard Jaffe's role as counsel of record in Shaw v. American Academy of Pediatrics, No. 1:26-cv-00171-TJK (D.D.C.), is from the court's own docket. A separate entity, Children's Health Defense–California Chapter, EIN 85-1140677, files its own returns and is not included in any figure on this page.